top of page

Delhi High Court’s order on AI Chatbots like ChatGPT

Technology's tendrils are extending into every facet of life, where the realm of law is undergoing a digital transformation of its own. Thus, coming to the era where AI Chatbots and lines of code hold the promise of influencing courtroom decisions, a recent ruling by the Delhi High Court has cast a spotlight on the role of AI Chatbots, specifically ChatGPT, in the hallowed halls of justice. So, in this blog, we will look in terms of dissecting and understanding the pivotal judicial rulings to explore the interplay between the use of Technology and Jurisprudence.

All about the ruling of the Delhi High Court-

The Delhi High Court's ruling comes like a thunderclap in the legal domain, resounded with the assertion that AI chatbot-generated responses, including those from the ever-elusive ChatGPT. Kit has also been viewed in a way whereby it should not stand as the solitary pillar for rendering legal judgments. As this bold assertion has already led to the ignition of debates, discussions, and deliberations, forcing upon a re-evaluation of the symbiotic relationship between AI and the court of law.

Understanding beneath the Legal Lens as to how AI Chatbots can lead to the painting of the potential of the judicial ecosystem-

Before delving into the implications of the ruling made by the Delhi High Court in detail, there comes a need to unveil the mesmerizing canvas upon which AI chatbots paint their potential in the judicial ecosystem.

Efficiency and Accessibility: AI chatbots usually offer a digital bridge for individuals who are navigating the labyrinthine corridors of the legal system. Their capacity to disseminate legal information and simplify convoluted jargon can make justice more accessible to the masses.

AI Chatbot as a tool for Research Aid: Imagine AI chatbots as tireless legal researchers sifting through mountains of case law and statutes in the blink of an eye. They could offer invaluable assistance to legal practitioners in their quest for precedents and relevant jurisprudence.

Time and Cost Savings: In a world where time is money, AI chatbots can expedite certain processes, thus reducing the burden on overburdened court dockets and shrinking legal expenses for litigants.

Impartiality and Consistency: Any kind of bias and human error, can sometimes infiltrate judicial decisions. AI chatbots, driven by algorithms, are impartial creatures, making their outcomes more consistent.

Limits of using AI Chatbots as a result of the Machine Mind-

However, before we let the AI chatbots gallop ahead in the race for judicial reform, it is imperative to acknowledge their limitations - the very boundaries that compelled the Delhi High Court to issue its cautionary stance.

The question of Contextual Clarity arising out of using AI Chatbots: While AI chatbots are linguistic marvels, they often struggle to grasp the nuance and intricacies inherent in human speech, leading to responses that might be technically correct but contextually off.

The question of Creativity arising out of using AI: The fine art of legal argumentation is riddled with creative thinking, an area where AI struggles. The ability to apply precedents in novel situations and consider moral dilemmas remains a quintessentially human trait.

Generation of Data and the Nature of Results Released by AI Chatbots: AI chatbots are only as good as the data they are fed. If biased, outdated, or incomplete data sources shape their training, they risk perpetuating the very inequalities courts aim to address.

The question of clarity resulting from producing relevant Judgments: Law is not a mere assemblage of rules; it reflects societal values and ethics. The intricate act of balancing these values requires the human touch that AI chatbots inherently lack.

How Artificial Intelligence can be seen and accessed as an ally of the Judiciary? -

Considering the Delhi High Court’s ruling, the question arises regarding the case of understanding how AI Chatbots can play a meaningful role in the Judicial realm.

Legal Research and Analysis: Rather than rendering verdicts, AI chatbots could assist legal professionals in developing an extensive level of research for following a shift through the volumes of legal literature, and presenting a relevant case law expediting the process without replacing human insight.

Drafting and Document Review: The meticulous task of drafting legal documents and scrutinizing contracts can be significantly enhanced by AI's speed and precision, yet final decisions should remain within the domain of human discernment.

Legal Education and Public Awareness: AI chatbots could serve as interactive educational tools, offering insights into legal procedures, rights, and obligations, thus empowering citizens to navigate legal landscapes with confidence.

As the digital dawn spills across courtrooms, AI chatbots, typified by ChatGPT, present both promises and perils for the judiciary. The Delhi High Court's ruling serves as a poignant reminder that while AI can augment and expedite certain aspects of legal proceedings, the mantle of judgment remains the exclusive preserve of human intelligence. As we tread this uncharted territory, let us navigate the AI landscape with caution, preserving the essence of justice while harnessing technology's undeniable potential.

Sources Referred


Follow Global Lawyers Association for more news and updated from International Legal Industry.



bottom of page